TCT-430 Ancillary radial versus femoral/brachial approach to reduce vascular complications in complex coronary, peripheral and structural interventions. Preliminary results of a study from the Italian Radial Club
نویسندگان
چکیده
TCT-429 Radial versus Femoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Intervention in Patients with CABG: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Stefano Rigattieri, Alessandro Sciahbasi, Emmanouil Brilakis, Francesco Burzotta, Sudhir Rathore, Francesco R. Pugliese, Antonis Ziakas, Yu Jie Zhou, Luis Guzman, Richard A. Anderson Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy; Sandro Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy; VA North Texas Healthcare System and UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Rome, Italy; Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; AHEPA Hospital, Thesalloniki, Thesalloniki; An Zhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, Beijing, China; University of Florida, Jacksonville, United States; University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales
منابع مشابه
Radial approach in percutaneous coronary interventions: current status in Brazil.
BACKGROUND Although the radial approach offers an unquestionable result in terms of reduction of vascular complications and occurrence of severe bleeding in comparison to the femoral approach, so far it has only been used in few centers which elected it as the preferential access. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the current status of percutaneous coronary interventions in Brazil, as regards the use of ...
متن کاملRadial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Angiography/Intervention in Women With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From the RIVAL Trial (Radial Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention).
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing coronary angiography/intervention. BACKGROUND The risk of bleeding and vascular access site complications are higher in women than in men. METHODS In a pre-specified RIVAL (RadIal Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention) subgroup analysis, we compared outcome...
متن کاملIdentifying patients at risk of vascular access complications
Routine coronary angiography and revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) have been shown to be of benefit.1,2 However, these patients are at an increased risk of bleeding due to antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants and invasive procedures. Major bleeding in patients with NSTEACS has been associated with increased risk of mortality.3-5 Vascula...
متن کاملBrachial approach for coronary angiography and intervention: totally obsolete, or a feasible alternative when radial access is not possible?
INTRODUCTION This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of brachial arterial puncture for coronary procedures when radial access is not possible. Radial arterial approach is the usual option for coronary procedures in our hospital. Whenever radial access is not possible, the brachial approach is preferred instead of the femoral approach. As many clinicians considered percutaneous brac...
متن کاملA comparative review of various interventional methods for coronary angiography and angioplasty
Background and Objective: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the most common diseases today. Among the diagnostic methods, angiography is the main and gold standard in the diagnosis Since angiography is an invasive procedure, this procedure complications range widely from minor problems with short term sequelae to life threatening ones may cause irreversible damage or even death. Materials...
متن کامل